Psychology Writing Services

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (79) Depression (11) Essay (2) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving Name Capella University PSYC FPX 3520 Introduction to Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Exploring Human Interactions: The Dynamics of Social Psychology Human beings inherently seek meaningful connections and engage in interpersonal relationships throughout their lives. Social psychology examines the complexities of these interactions, emphasizing the importance of ethical, respectful, and cooperative engagement (Mcleod, 2022). Failure to adhere to these principles can lead to emotional distress and antisocial behavior. Social psychologists provide insights into distinguishing between positive and negative behaviors, highlighting the essential nature of social interaction for human well-being (Mcleod, 2022). Analyzing the Case Study: Susan’s Social Journey Susan, a college student, balances her academic responsibilities with the pursuit of social connections. Invited to a party by her friend Mark, she looks forward to a break from her studies. At the party, Susan’s charm and vibrant personality attract attention. However, Mark misinterprets her friendliness as romantic interest, leading to a series of events that force Susan to address the misunderstanding with integrity and clarity (Mcleod, 2022). Understanding Unrequited Love: A Psychological Perspective Research by Clark et al. (2019) explores the concept of unrequited love, characterized by one-sided affection where the feelings are not reciprocated. The person experiencing unrequited love may struggle with feelings of inadequacy and vulnerability (Clark et al., 2019). Additionally, Dwyer (2020) discusses the negative impact of unrequited love on mental and physical health, advocating for ethical approaches to alleviate heartbreak. The intensity of unrequited love can vary, influencing emotional responses and coping strategies (Dwyer, 2020). Applying Social Psychological Theory to Susan’s Dilemma Susan’s situation reflects the dynamics of unrequited love, as Mark’s romantic advances are not reciprocated. Despite Susan’s friendly demeanor, she does not harbor romantic feelings for Mark, leading her to gently but firmly reject his advances (Clark et al., 2019). Susan’s actions exemplify ethical behavior, emphasizing honesty and respect in her interactions (Dwyer, 2020). Navigating Ethical Terrain: Susan’s Moral Awareness Susan’s response showcases her moral awareness, demonstrating sensitivity to Mark’s feelings while maintaining her own boundaries. By addressing the situation with tact and empathy, Susan aims to minimize harm and preserve mutual respect (Gheaus, 2021). Despite Mark’s misguided feelings, Susan remains committed to ethical conduct, skillfully navigating the complexities of interpersonal relationships. Embracing Critical Thinking: A Multifaceted Perspective Critical thinking encourages a comprehensive examination of Susan’s experience, recognizing the various perspectives and motivations involved. While Susan acts with integrity, Mark’s misunderstandings arise from a mix of personal interpretation and external factors (The British Psychological Society, 2022). Emphasizing fairness and empathy, critical thinking promotes understanding and resolution in interpersonal conflicts (Brown, 2018). Conclusion Susan’s experience illustrates the intricate interplay between social psychology theories and real-life scenarios. Her handling of Mark’s romantic interest highlights the principles of ethical conduct and moral awareness, demonstrating thoughtfulness and compassion. By embracing critical thinking, Susan’s story underscores the importance of empathy and understanding in fostering meaningful human connections. References Clark, E., Votaw, K. L. B., Hasan, M., & Fernandez, P. (2019). Unrequited love: The role of prior commitment, motivation to remain friends, and friendship maintenance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 120(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1648234 PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving Dwyer, B. (2020). The Need for a Scientific Cure for Feelings of Heartbreak and Unrequited Love. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/42105233/The_Need_for_a_Scientific_Cure_for_Feelings_of_Heartbreak_and_Unrequited_Love Gheaus, A. (2021). Unrequited love, self-victimization and the target of appropriate resentment. The Journal of Ethics, 24, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-021-09368-0 Mcleod, S. (2022). Social Psychology: Definition, Theories, Principles, & Examples. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://simplypsychology.org/social-psychology.html PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving The British Psychological Society. (2022). Why is critical thinking important for Psychology students? – The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/why-critical-thinking-important-psychology-students Also Read PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good Bad and Loving Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Read More Load More

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (78) Depression (11) Essay (2) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Name Capella University PSYC FPX 3520 Introduction to Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Thinking, Feeling, and Believing: A Case Study This case study examines the unethical practices of Frank, a psychologist, who deceives his patient, Eduardo, by manipulating symptoms to fit his narrative. Frank’s actions not only endanger Eduardo’s well-being but also raise serious ethical issues about his professional behavior. Confirmation Bias in Psychological Practice The central concept in this case study is confirmation bias, a cognitive bias where individuals favor information that confirms their preconceptions while ignoring contradicting evidence (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). Frank exhibits confirmation bias by emphasizing symptoms of depression in Eduardo and overlooking signs of Dependent Personality Disorder. Research Support Confirmation bias is well-documented in decision-making processes. Rajsic, Wilson, and Pratt (2015) conducted studies showing that individuals tend to prioritize information that aligns with their expectations during visual search tasks. Similarly, Kappes et al. (2019) explored how people use others’ opinions, demonstrating a tendency to dismiss conflicting information. Application of Confirmation Bias Frank’s bias is clear as he selectively focuses on symptoms that indicate major depression in Eduardo, disregarding signs of Dependent Personality Disorder. This selective perception distorts his conclusions and poses significant risks to Eduardo’s mental health. PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Ethical Reasoning Application Frank’s rationalizations for his actions serve to mask the unethical nature of his behavior, allowing him to justify deceitful practices under the pretense of future success as a psychologist. These rationalizations obscure the moral consequences of his actions, compromising his professional integrity (Mulder & van Dijk, 2020). Critical Thinking Application Frank’s selective gathering of information hampers his critical thinking. By filtering data and ignoring the broader context, he undermines the accuracy and relevance of his assessments (Paul & Elder, 2012). References Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2020). Social psychology and human nature (5th ed.). Cengage Limited. Kappes, A., Harvey, A. H., Lohrenz, T., Montague, P. R., & Sharot, T. (2019). Confirmation bias in the utilization of others’ opinion strength. Nature News. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-019-0549-2 Mulder, L. B., & van Dijk, E. (2020). Moral rationalization contributes more strongly to escalation of unethical behavior among low moral identifiers than among high moral identifiers. Frontiers in Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960263/ Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: Intellectual standards essential to reasoning well within every domain of human thought, part Two. Journal of Developmental Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1067269 PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Rajsic, J., Wilson, D. E., & Pratt, J. (2015). Confirmation bias in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26098120/ Also Read PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 3 Thinking, Feeling, and Believing Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 4 Strategies for Enhancing Learning and Memory Fact Sheet Read More Load More

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (77) Depression (11) Essay (2) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Name Capella University PSYC FPX 3520 Introduction to Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Self-Regulation Case Study Case Study 3: Dr. Frank – Practicing Psychology This case study examines the challenges faced by Dr. Frank, a therapist whose personal issues impact his professional and ethical decision-making. Running a private practice, Dr. Frank encounters difficulties attracting clients with health insurance, resulting in financial stress. A pivotal moment arises when a potential client exhibits symptoms indicative of Depression, a condition covered by insurance. However, the client is diagnosed with Dependent Personality Disorder, which typically isn’t covered. Driven by financial necessity, Dr. Frank persuades the client to accept a Major Depression diagnosis, thereby crossing ethical boundaries for personal gain. This situation highlights Dr. Frank’s unethical behavior, stemming from compromised self-regulation. The Concept of Self-Regulation Self-regulation is crucial for achieving personal goals through the control of thoughts, actions, and emotions, as emphasized in social psychology literature (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). It involves conscious control over impulses, fostering personal development, critical thinking skills, and positively influencing moral values. Research Support Research in the Journal of Media Psychology discusses motivations behind self-regulation in social media usage (Ozimek & Förster, 2021). It shows how individuals seek validation and affirmation online, rooted in personal expectations. Additionally, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology explores how the importance of certain goals motivates self-regulation, impacting successful goal achievement (Critcher & Ferguson, 2016). PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Research Interpretation These studies highlight the varied motivations driving self-regulation, shaped by societal expectations and personal aspirations. They reveal the complex interplay between internal and external factors influencing self-regulatory behaviors. Application of Self-Regulation Dr. Frank’s actions illustrate self-regulation affected by external pressures, empathy, and personal gain. His unethical behavior, driven by financial desperation and empathy for the client, reflects a compromised self-regulatory process. Ethical Reasoning Application Dr. Frank’s ethical breach demonstrates Incrementalism, where individuals gradually slip into unethical behavior due to various pressures (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). Financial strain and professional pressures lead Dr. Frank to compromise his moral integrity. Critical Thinking Application Dr. Frank’s decision-making showcases Egocentric Thinking, where personal interests overshadow ethical considerations (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). His actions, aimed at financial benefit, neglect the patient’s well-being and ethical principles. References Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2020). Social Psychology and Human Nature (5th ed.). Cengage Limited. Critcher, C. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2016). ‘Whether I like it or not, it’s important’: Implicit importance of means predicts self-regulatory persistence and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 818–839. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000053.supp PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Ozimek, P., & Förster, J. (2021). The social online-self-regulation-theory: A review of self-regulation in social media. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 33(4), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000304 Also Read PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 2 Self Regulation Read More PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 4 Strategies for Enhancing Learning and Memory Fact Sheet Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 3 Brain Injury Case Studies Read More Load More

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (76) Depression (11) Essay (2) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Name Capella University PSYC FPX 3520 Introduction to Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Research Breakdown Worksheet Hypothesis or Research Question The hypothesis suggests a positive relationship between self-serving attributional bias and subjective well-being, with positive coping strategies acting as mediators in this relationship (Sanjuan & Magallares, 2014). PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Researchers’ Conclusion The study’s findings support the hypothesis, indicating that self-serving attributional bias indirectly impacts the cognitive components of subjective well-being through emotional processes. Additionally, the use of problem-solving and positive cognitive restructuring coping strategies enhances well-being, whereas avoidance coping strategies are found to have negative effects (Sanjuan & Magallares, 2014). As a result, well-being programs should focus on developing problem-solving skills, encouraging positive cognitive restructuring, and promoting healthy attributional styles while discouraging avoidance behaviors. Research Method The study utilizes the Attributional Style Questionnaire, which presents participants with hypothetical scenarios to evaluate their attributional style. Participants respond to twelve scenarios, equally split between positive and negative contexts (Sanjuan & Magallares, 2014). Application to Professional or Daily Life This research offers valuable insights for my professional life, particularly in managing individuals with self-serving attributional bias. In settings where narcissistic traits or victim mentalities are prevalent, understanding the harmful impact of such biases and promoting positive coping strategies is essential. Encouraging involvement in well-being programs can lead to cognitive shifts and foster healthier thinking and behavior. Furthermore, this research provides effective communication strategies to engage with individuals struggling with self-serving attributional bias, thereby enhancing accountability and promoting cognitive and emotional well-being (Sanjuan & Magallares, 2014). PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown References Sanjuan, P., & Magallares, A. (2014). Coping strategies as mediating variables between self-serving attributional bias and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 442–453. Also Read PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 1 Research Breakdown Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 4 Strategies for Enhancing Learning and Memory Fact Sheet Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 3 Brain Injury Case Studies Read More PSYC FPX 3500 Assessment 2 Cognitive Psychology Paper Read More Load More

Get In Touch

    Psychology Writing Services delivers tailored solutions for academic and professional exploration of the human psyche.

    Our Services

    our services

    © Copyright 2024 powered by PsychologyWritingServices.com

    You cannot copy content of this page, Contact Team if you need Help