Psychology Writing Services

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (119) Depression (11) Essay (2) MS Psychology (100) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching Name Capella University PSY FPX 7520 Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Abstract Groupthink aims to unify employees into a cohesive unit, prioritizing collective goals over realistic alternatives. It serves as a potent instrument for organizational success. This assessment explores strategies to enhance employee creativity through insights from social psychology and the social dynamics influencing groupthink. Introduction In high-stress environments, decision-making can be compromised, leading to a cascade of poor choices and organizational challenges such as high turnover rates. Team-building initiatives offer a means to identify and mitigate decision-making flaws, thus fostering independent thinking and reducing the sway of social influences. Enhancing Mental Efficiency Understanding the genesis of groupthink within an organization lays the groundwork for its mitigation. Groupthink, as described by Hassan (2014), manifests as a collective reluctance to explore alternative courses of action, driven by a desire for group cohesion. This phenomenon undermines mental acuity and moral discernment, often resulting in the dominance of a few vocal leaders within a group. Impact on Decision-Making Pressure within group dynamics can precipitate hasty decisions, further impeding mental clarity and moral judgment. Authoritarian figures may emerge, stifling dissenting voices and perpetuating a homogeneous mindset (Hassan, 2014). Role of Social Psychology Social psychology elucidates how individuals’ behaviors and responses are shaped by social contexts. In healthcare settings, issues such as organizational inefficiencies and a dearth of creative problem-solving stem from groupthink dynamics. Formal procedures aligned with institutional goals can counteract these tendencies, fostering collaboration and decision-making efficacy (Maiha & Saidu, 2014). Influencing Factors Staff empowerment in decision-making processes, devoid of emotional barriers, is pivotal. Social dynamics and individual personalities influence group dynamics, with assertive individuals more likely to voice dissenting opinions. A conducive environment, where diverse perspectives are valued, enhances creativity and decision-making quality (Madigosky & Schaik, 2016). Strategies to Minimize Groupthink Restricting group size and encouraging diverse input can mitigate the pitfalls of groupthink. Personality diversity within teams fosters innovative thinking, while cultural considerations enrich decision-making processes, ensuring broader participation and a congenial atmosphere (Maiha & Saidu, 2014; Pratkanis & Turner, 2013). PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching Conclusion Groupthink stifles creativity and impedes organizational progress. By recognizing and addressing its manifestations, organizations can cultivate a more vibrant and resilient workplace culture, conducive to innovation and sustainable growth. References Hassan, M. A. G. (2014). Groupthink principles and fundamentals in organizations. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Groupthink-principles-andfundamentals-in-Hassan/aa7d15b59da0c492d19bed3dbf34408a2949b840 Madigosky, W., & Schaik, S. (2016). Context matters: groupthink and outcomes of health care teams. Medical Education, 50(4), 387-389. Maiha, A. H., & Saidu, U. (2014). Local Government Administration And Its Impending Problems In Recent Times. International Journal of Social Sciences, 9(9). PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching Pratkanis, A. R., & Turner, M. E. (2013). Methods for counteracting groupthink risk: a critical appraisal. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), 2(4), 18-38. Also Read PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Read More Load More

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (119) Depression (11) Essay (2) MS Psychology (99) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan Name Capella University PSY FPX 7520 Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Abstract Workplace aggression presents significant risks to both employees and clients. Establishing a structured intervention to deescalate such incidents is imperative for achieving favorable outcomes. This assessment delineates a plan for implementing aggression intervention training for staff, focusing on internal dynamics and client interactions. It investigates the influence of cultural factors on responses to aggression and proposes objectives, goals, and a comprehensive intervention strategy to foster a zero-tolerance atmosphere. Introduction The initiative to introduce an aggression intervention program for staff is targeted at addressing confrontational scenarios, particularly within the confines of a maximum-security prison environment. Given the diverse backgrounds of individuals encountered in such settings, effectively managing aggression is essential for ensuring safety and conducive work environments. By drawing from the principles of social learning theory, this training aims to equip staff with proficient intervention techniques. Setting Albert Bandura’s social learning theory highlights the learned nature of aggression, stressing the role of behavioral modeling. In carceral settings, where individuals may experience heightened frustration and diminished autonomy, learned behaviors can manifest in acts of violence. Cultural influences further shape attitudes towards aggression, underscoring the significance of comprehending diverse viewpoints in mitigating workplace hostility. Program Focus and Structure The training program seeks to bolster self-esteem and self-efficacy while integrating cognitive psychology and social learning theory to mitigate workplace aggression. Spanning a duration of three weeks, the program empowers staff to apply acquired methodologies and provide feedback on their effectiveness. By fostering improved communication and relationships among staff members, the program endeavors to establish a safer work environment. Goals and Objectives The primary aim is to decrease aggression among staff and between inmates and staff, cultivating a culture of mutual respect and safety. Training methodologies concentrate on identifying triggers for aggression and enhancing social functioning to diminish workplace hostility. Activities such as role-playing exercises are geared towards boosting staff morale and interpersonal dynamics, ultimately reducing institutional aggression. Interventions Interventions targeting staff accountability and cognitive skills are crucial in addressing aggression, aiming to rectify cognitive distortions and foster self-awareness. Novaco’s anger management model furnishes a framework for comprehending and managing anger responses, emphasizing self-regulation and empathy. Proactive measures, including stress management strategies and effective policy communication, further aid staff in deescalating hostile situations. Recommendations for Follow-Up Training Supplementary assertiveness training should complement aggression intervention endeavors, seamlessly integrated into organizational strategic plans. Continuous training initiatives and organizational backing are indispensable for maintaining a zero-tolerance stance towards aggression. By addressing underlying factors contributing to aggression, such as job ambiguity and deficient leadership, organizations can cultivate an atmosphere characterized by safety and respect. PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan Conclusion The implementation of aggression intervention training is imperative for safeguarding workplace safety and facilitating effective conflict resolution. By arming staff with the requisite tools to manage aggression and appreciate diverse perspectives, organizations can nurture a culture characterized by respect and collaboration. In demanding environments like correctional facilities, such training is indispensable for upholding order and fostering positive interactions. References Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Carré, J.M., Iselin, A.R., & Welker, K.M. (2014). Testosterone Reactivity to Provocation Mediates the Effect of Early Intervention on Aggressive Behavior. Psychological, 25(5), 1140-1146. Retrieved from http://pss.sagepub.com/content/25/5/1140.short Chi Meng Chu, Michael Daffern, James R.P. Ogloff. (2013). Predicting aggression in acute inpatient psychiatric setting using BVC, DASA, and HCR-20 Clinical scale. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(2), 269-285. Fox, N.A., Henderson, H., & Marshall, P.J., Nichols, K.E., Ghera, M.M. (2004). Behavioral Inhibition: Linking Biology and Behavior within a Developmental Framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(), 235-262. Kwon, D. (2015, October). Are Prions behind All Neurodegenerative Diseases? Scientific American, 313(5). Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-prions-behind-all-neurodegenerative-diseases/ PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan McLeod, S. A. (2007). Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/ Also Read PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 3 Aggression Intervention Training Plan Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 6 Problem Solving, Decision Making, and Intelligence Read More Load More

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (119) Depression (11) Essay (2) MS Psychology (98) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Name Capella University PSY FPX 7520 Social Psychology Prof. Name Date Objectives In my capacity as a political consultant for the League of Women, I am entrusted with formulating guidelines for conducting impartial and equitable public town hall debates. This task is challenging due to the considerable influence of both social media and mainstream media on public perceptions, which are instrumental in shaping opinions and beliefs. Understanding the psychological dynamics and impacts in this context is crucial. Social psychology examines how individuals behave in social settings and how they perceive and respond to others (Van Lange, Kruglanski, & Higgins, 2012). Our social perceptions influence how we interpret events and formulate responses (Van Lange et al., 2012). To counteract the influence of social and media pressures, political advisors must scrutinize the questions posed by the media, ensure moderators allocate equal time to candidates, and ensure fair and meaningful questioning by mediators. The conduct of moderators significantly influences debate outcomes, with the framing and handling of questions playing a crucial role. Moderators’ motivations often revolve around audience engagement, personal gain, or sensationalism rather than focusing on substantive issues (Turcotte, 2014). Despite the introduction of the town hall format by the Commission on Presidential Debates in 1992, the press continues to wield influence over the questions asked (Turcotte, 2014). However, the town hall format tends to steer away from conflict, prioritizing public inquiries about plans and proposals (Turcotte, 2014). Final Deliverable Town hall-style meetings provide a platform for more transparent and impartial debates. With the audience primarily driving the discussion, moderator influence is minimized. Risks Moderator bias influencing the audience. Challenges accommodating a large audience’s questions. Potential disruptions from unruly audience members. Inappropriate or off-topic questions from the audience. Project Budget / Spending Estimate No specific budget is proposed for this initiative, which aims to enhance debate formats and mitigate the impact of social influences without incurring additional costs. Research-based Guidelines for Fair Public Debates and Media Coverage To ensure fairness in public town hall meetings, it is crucial to recognize the influence of social and media dynamics. Social media platforms serve as real-time arenas for political discourse, often shaping initial reactions as significantly as the debates themselves (Pfeiffer, 2015). The League of Women Voters (2016) underscores the importance of pre-debate preparation, critical observation during the debate, and thoughtful reflection afterward. Turcotte (2014) observes that town hall-style debates prioritize substantive policy discussions over entertainment, contrasting with traditional formats. Rooy, Wood, & Tran (2016) highlight how social comparisons influence group dynamics, shaping individual attitudes and behaviors. Guidelines for Fair Public Debate Drawing on Festinger’s Social Comparison Model (Van Lange et al., 2012), these guidelines emphasize the importance of unbiased moderation, minimizing moderator influence, and fostering an environment conducive to substantive discussion. Non-verbal cues, such as body language, can subtly sway audience perceptions (CNN, 2012). In a town hall setting, audience involvement can encourage candidates to focus on pertinent issues and avoid confrontational rhetoric. Moderators must ensure fairness, manage audience participation, and select neutral venues to uphold the integrity of the debate. PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates References CNN. (2012). Decoding body language from the final debate [Transcript]. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2012/10/24/ac-bts-body-language-expert-final-debate. League of Women Voters (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.lwv.org. Pfeiffer, D. (2015). How social media is revolutionizing debates. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/15/opinions/pfeiffer-social-media-debates/index.html. Rooy, D., Wood, I., & Tran, E. (2016). Modeling the emergence of shared attitudes from group dynamics using an agent-based model of social comparison theory. System Research & Behavioral Science, 33, 188-204. Turcotte, J (2014). The news norms and values of presidential debate agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication and Society, 18(3), 1-20. PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (2012). Handbook of theories of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Also Read PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 2 Minimizing Social Influence in Debates Read More PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 6 Problem Solving, Decision Making, and Intelligence Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 5 Read More Load More

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1

PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Free Sample Papers Anxiety (1) BS Psychology (119) Depression (11) Essay (2) MS Psychology (97) Need writer for your Psychology Papers? Get your paper in 24 Hours. We have a team of Psychology Academic Writers who can help you quickly write plagiarism-free papers, essays, and research articles. Hire Writer PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Name Capella University PSY FPX 7520 Social Psychology Prof. Name Date   Also Read PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 1 Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 6 Problem Solving, Decision Making, and Intelligence Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 5 Read More PSY FPX 7421 Assessment 4 Language Read More Load More

Get In Touch

    Psychology Writing Services delivers tailored solutions for academic and professional exploration of the human psyche.

    Our Services

    our services

    © Copyright 2024 powered by PsychologyWritingServices.com

    You cannot copy content of this page, Contact Team if you need Help